Meeting: County Commissioner Regular Meeting

Live stream not working in Chrome or Edge?

Bookmarks
Transcript
Share
Favorites

Bookmark list

To hear audio, please click on any item of business listed below.
Roll Call
Amendments to Agenda
Consent Agenda
Warrants: General Warrants – February 26, 27, and 28, 2025
Bids: Present Bid #B2500014, Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update – Office of Emergency Management
Present Bid #B2500017, Erosion Control and Revegetation Services – Department of Public Works
Present Bid #B2500022, Boiler and Piping Replacement for Alternative Programs Building – Facilities Department
New Business – General: Consider Amendment #6 to Agreement for Services for Motor Vehicle Self-Service Kiosks and Authorize Chair to Sign – Intellectual Technology, Inc.
Consider Contract ID #9136 Memorandum of Agreement to Purchase Property Interest for Right-of-Way Acquisition for County Roads 13 and 54 Intersection Roundabout Project (Northwest Corner) and Authorize Chair to Sign – Loveland Ready-Mix Concrete, Inc.
Consider Contract ID #9146 Memorandum of Agreement to Purchase Property Interest for Right-of-Way Acquisition for County Roads 13 and 54 Intersection Roundabout Project (Southwest Corner) and Authorize Chair to Sign – Loveland Ready-Mix Concrete, Inc.
Consider Contract ID #9151 Memorandum of Agreement to Purchase Property Interest for Right-of-Way Acquisition for County Roads 13 and 54 Intersection Roundabout Project (Northeast Corner) and Authorize Chair to Sign – Croissant Family Farms, LLC
Consider Three (3) Party Tender Agreement and Full Release Between Surety Company and Obligee for Law Administration Elevator Modernization Project, and Authorize Chair to Sign – DZMod Lift Company, and Capitol Indemnity Corporation
Consider Three (3) Party Tender Agreement and Full Release Between Surety Company and Obligee for Jail Elevator Modernization Project, and Authorize Chair to Sign – DZMod Lift Company, and Capitol Indemnity Corporation
Consider Appointment to Workforce Development Board
New Business – Planning: Consider Application for Small Business Incentive Program and Authorize Release of Economic Development Trust Funds (Tier I) – Anderson Baseball Academy, LLC, c/o Mike Anderson
Consider Partial Vacation, VAC24-0028, of Two-Lot Recorded Exemption, RECX20-0063, for Removal of Lot B – Justus and Debra Pettit
Public Comment

Transcript search

Transcript

	Count 3. Can we please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance? Thank.	00:11:37
	I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.	00:11:41
	And to the Republic, for which it says 1 nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.	00:11:45
	Good morning. It's Monday, March 3rd, 2025, 9:00. Will County board hearings roll call please? Jason Maxie, Lynette Pepler present	00:11:55
	Kevin Ross.	00:12:00
	Scott James excused Harry Buck here.	00:12:06
	All right, let the record reflect that three out of five commissioners are here.	00:12:10
	Amendments to the agenda.	00:12:15
	We have any amendments, Houston? No, ma'am.	00:12:17
	All right, that brings us to consent agenda.	00:12:19
	We have a partial vacation. Partial vacation V AC24-0028.	00:12:23
	Of A2 lot recorded exemption.	00:12:29
	R EC X2O-0063 for removal of lot B and Justice and Deborah Pettit.	00:12:31
	Is there anyone here that would like to speak regarding this partial vacation?	00:12:38
	Umm, I see a.	00:12:44
	Yes, we have.	00:12:45
	2 individuals.	00:12:47
	Justice had it.	00:12:48
	We need you to come up to the mic, Sir.	00:12:50
	What you need to do is.	00:12:52
	Go ahead and just take it off because staff has some.	00:12:55
	Yes, to add so then we can.	00:12:59
	Added to the regular agenda and then call it up and down.	00:13:02
	So right now, my understanding is public hearing for anybody to take this off of consent, that's all we're doing is.	00:13:07
	OK. And I guess the recommendation of staff is to go ahead and do that anyway because there are some things that staff needs to	00:13:14
	talk about.	00:13:19
	OK. Do I need to make a motion on that? Do we have to have a motion? Yes, I think we do.	00:13:24
	OK, Madam Chair, I move to.	00:13:29
	Move vacation 240028 out of the consent agenda.	00:13:32
	It has been moved by Commissioner Pepper, second by Commissioner Maxie.	00:13:38
	Any discussion?	00:13:43
	All in favor say aye aye. Opposed say nay.	00:13:45
	So we don't need Mr. Petter right now? No, we will not. So.	00:13:48
	You'll call it back up and then you can come up and talk.	00:13:53
	OK. So we were going to put that though.	00:13:57
	In the new business planning, right, you can do that.	00:14:01
	So it will be the, I guess the chairs prerogative to put that in the new business planning #2.	00:14:06
	OK, that.	00:14:13
	Takes us to warrants. General warrants February 26th, 27th and 28th, 2025.	00:14:15
	Madam Chair, move to approve the general warrants for February 26th, 27th and 28th for 2025. Commissioner Waxy, second by	00:14:21
	Commissioner Pepler. Further discussion.	00:14:26
	All in favor say aye aye. Opposed say nay.	00:14:32
	Those general warrants are approved. Good morning, Toby. Good morning. Present bid B 2500014 Multi jurisdiction jurisdictional.	00:14:35
	Hazard mitigation plan update. Office of Emergency Management.	00:14:46
	Good morning, Toby Taylor with purchasing.	00:14:51
	3 vendors have replied to the solicitation. The Office of Emergency Management are reviewing those replies and anticipates	00:14:53
	bringing a recommendation to the Board on March 17th, 2025. All right, any questions of the Board?	00:14:59
	OK #2 Present bid B 250-0017 Erosion control and revisitation services, Department of Public Works.	00:15:06
	7 vendors have replied to the solicitation. The Department of Public Works are reviewing those replies and anticipates bringing a	00:15:16
	recommendation to the Board on March 17th, 2025. All right and #3 present bid B 250-0022.	00:15:24
	Boiler and piping replacement for alternative programs building facilities department.	00:15:32
	3 vendors have replied to the solicitation. The Facilities Department are reviewing those replies and anticipates bringing a	00:15:37
	recommendation to the Board on March 17th, 2025. All right. Thank you very much, Sir.	00:15:42
	That brings us to new Business General.	00:15:49
	Consider amendment number six to agreement for services for motor vehicles self-service kiosk and authorized chair to sign	00:15:51
	Intellectual Technology Inc. Good morning, Rudy.	00:15:56
	Good morning, Rudy Santos, Chief Deputy Will County Clerk and Recorders Office.	00:16:02
	This is a.	00:16:07
	What's the?	00:16:11
	I would ask him to.	00:16:14
	Have the chair respectfully sign the agreement.	00:16:16
	To amend the contract that we currently have with our motor vehicle kiosks.	00:16:19
	Currently we have three of them, two of them here at the King Soopers and West Greeley.	00:16:23
	And when the Firestone at the King Soopers there.	00:16:28
	They're upgrading the technology with new credit card readers and.	00:16:31
	The old ones are only swipe to pay.	00:16:36
	The new ones have an actual tap to pay as well as.	00:16:38
	Newer technologies like Apple Pay, Google Pay, Samsung Pay.	00:16:42
	Cool. Any questions at the board move to approve the resolution. Second, it has been moved by Commissioner Maxey. Second, by	00:16:47
	Commissioner Pepler.	00:16:51
	Further discussion.	00:16:55
	All in favor, Say aye. Aye. Opposed say nay. Madam Chair, did the board approve the rest of the consent agenda? No. I was going to	00:16:57
	do that.	00:17:01
	OK, so we can do it now. You want me to do it now? OK.	00:17:06
	Let's go back. I apologize to the consent agenda.	00:17:10
	Can I get a motion to approve the consent agenda?	00:17:15
	It has been moved by Commissioner Maxie, second by Commissioner Pepper.	00:17:18
	On further discussion.	00:17:22
	All in favor, say aye. Opposed say nay.	00:17:24
	Consent agenda is approved. I apologize again.	00:17:27
	Going back to new business #2 consider country.	00:17:31
	Thank you. Thank you.	00:17:35
	Consider contract ID 9136 Memorandum of Agreement to purchase property interest for right of way acquisition for county Roads 13	00:17:37
	and 54 intersection roundabout project northwest corner and authorized chair design. Loveland ready mix concrete ink. Good	00:17:43
	morning.	00:17:49
	Good morning, Clay. Canon Public Works.	00:17:55
	This Memorandum of Agreement is for the purchase of.	00:17:57
	Property from.	00:18:03
	Loveland writing mix in Larimer County.	00:18:05
	For the.	00:18:08
	County Road 5413 roundabout that sits right on the.	00:18:10
	The border.	00:18:16
	Between us.	00:18:17
	So we're acquiring right of way.	00:18:19
	In Larimer County.	00:18:22
	And then the deed will be in Larimer counties name.	00:18:23
	The cost of this project or?	00:18:29
	This right of way.	00:18:32
	Is $512,277.50.	00:18:35
	Plus closing costs.	00:18:40
	At this point, I don't know what the closing costs will be generally there in the neighborhood of.	00:18:42
	One to $2000.	00:18:47
	I can't get a closing cost until I get a closing date.	00:18:50
	And so everything is predicated on the closing date.	00:18:54
	Which we can't get till we have an assigned agreement.	00:18:58
	The attorneys office has reviewed the.	00:19:03
	Agreement and Loveland Remix assigned it.	00:19:06
	And we have the funds allocated in our 2025.	00:19:10
	Budget.	00:19:15
	I'm answering questions.	00:19:17
	All right. Are there any questions on the board?	00:19:19
	I'll make a motion to approve contract. ID 9136. Second, it has been moved by Commissioner Maxie. Second by Commissioner Pepper.	00:19:22
	Further discussion.	00:19:26
	All in favor, say aye. Opposed say nay.	00:19:31
	Contract ID 9136 is approved.	00:19:34
	#3 Consider contract ID 9146 Memorandum of Agreement to purchase property interest for right of way acquisition for the County	00:19:37
	Roads 13 and 54 intersection.	00:19:43
	Roundabout project southwest corner and authorized chair to sign Loveland rather mix concrete ink.	00:19:49
	Good morning. Good morning, Clay County Public Works.	00:19:56
	This agreement is.	00:19:59
	Similar to the same one that's owned by the same property owner, Loveland Ready Mix.	00:20:03
	It's also located in Larimer County, so we're acquiring.	00:20:08
	Right of way on behalf of Larimer County.	00:20:12
	The cost for this is 458,800.	00:20:15
	$86 and zero cents plus closing costs.	00:20:20
	I didn't answer any questions.	00:20:26
	All right. Are there any questions of the board?	00:20:28
	Make a motion to approve contract ID 9146 Second.	00:20:31
	And has been moved by Commissioner Maxie, seconded by Commissioner Pepler. Further discussion.	00:20:35
	Say aye. Opposed, say nay.	00:20:41
	Contract ID 9146 is approved #4 Consider Contract ID 9151. Memorandum of Agreement to purchase property interest.	00:20:43
	A right away acquisition for County Roads 13 and 54 intersection roundabout project.	00:20:52
	Northeast Corner and authorized chair to sign Croissant Family Farms, LLC.	00:20:58
	Good morning, Clay County Public Works.	00:21:04
	This.	00:21:06
	Is for a much smaller parcel for the.	00:21:08
	5413.	00:21:11
	Roundabout it is.	00:21:13
	A permanent easement.	00:21:16
	And a temporary easement that we have to acquire on.	00:21:17
	Behalf of Public Service of Colorado.	00:21:21
	We're building a road over their existing easement, so we have to replace it.	00:21:26
	And pay them to move into their new easement.	00:21:30
	Umm, this agreement was sent around in a pass around.	00:21:33
	And returned on January 9th.	00:21:39
	We had asked that we'd be able to negotiate up to $7500.	00:21:44
	At that time and after negotiating with Mr. Croissant.	00:21:50
	We came to a $5547.31.	00:21:55
	I do realize there's.	00:22:02
	Some questions.	00:22:04
	Potentially on the agreement itself.	00:22:05
	Where some totals have been crossed out and.	00:22:09
	Handwritten men.	00:22:13
	And that.	00:22:14
	Rather than having a new memorandum of agreement.	00:22:16
	Sent out to this landowner.	00:22:20
	We're following the cdot process for.	00:22:22
	How they want to see.	00:22:25
	The changes.	00:22:28
	To an MOA documented.	00:22:30
	So, umm.	00:22:32
	Each party has to initial.	00:22:34
	So the owner.	00:22:37
	Mitshoff, Who's our right of agent?	00:22:40
	Initialed and then when this agreement gets signed.	00:22:42
	If it gets signed, the board chair will have to sign initially as well.	00:22:45
	Thank you for clarifying that through.	00:22:51
	All right. Any other questions at the board?	00:22:54
	I move to approve contract. ID 9151. It has been moved by Commissioner Pepler, second by Commissioner Maxie. Further discussion.	00:22:58
	All in favor, Say aye. Opposed, say nay. Contract ID 9151 is approved. Thank you.	00:23:06
	#5 consider three party tender agreement and full release between surgery, bond or surety.	00:23:14
	Company and oblige or.	00:23:21
	Law administration, elevator monetization project and authorized chair to sign DZ Mod, Lift company and Capital Indemnity	00:23:25
	Corporation.	00:23:30
	Madam Chair, this item and the next one are sort of tied together.	00:23:35
	Very similar, if not identical, but different projects.	00:23:41
	So this one is for the elevator in the law Administration building.	00:23:45
	The next one, and through the elevator. A elevator.	00:23:51
	In the jail.	00:23:55
	OK, so.	00:23:57
	The company that had been hired.	00:23:59
	To do the work on both projects.	00:24:01
	Is gone.	00:24:07
	We're not sure where, but is gone.	00:24:08
	The bond.	00:24:11
	A company has arranged with Dzmod Lift Company.	00:24:12
	To come in and do the work.	00:24:18
	And the extra expense for both projects.	00:24:21
	Is going to be paid for by Capital Indemnity Corporation, a bond company.	00:24:26
	So with this agreement does, in the next agreement does.	00:24:33
	Is make it so that we can.	00:24:38
	Agree with.	00:24:41
	DZ mod Capital One demo incorporation.	00:24:43
	For them to go ahead and take care of them and complete the projects.	00:24:47
	That the other company.	00:24:52
	Was supposed to do.	00:24:55
	So peak elevator was.	00:24:58
	Previous company that is.	00:25:01
	Gone. So we would recommend approval of both agreements.	00:25:04
	All right. Are there any questions on the board?	00:25:10
	Madam Chair, I've moved to approve the resolution for DZ Mod Company to, you know, help with the law administration elevator as	00:25:14
	per the.	00:25:19
	For the item on the agenda.	00:25:24
	Second, it has been moved by Commissioner Maxie, second by Commissioner Pepper. Further discussion.	00:25:26
	All in favor, Say aye. Opposed say no.	00:25:32
	That resolution passes and then.	00:25:35
	Number six, consider three party tender agreement and full release between Surety company and Abagi for jail.	00:25:37
	Elevator modernization project and authorized chair design.	00:25:44
	DZ, mod lift company and capital endemic.	00:25:48
	Indemnity Corporation resolution.	00:25:51
	Second, it has been moved by Commissioner Maxie, second by Commissioner Petler.	00:25:54
	Further discussion.	00:25:58
	All in favor, say aye. Opposed say nay.	00:26:00
	That resolution is passed.	00:26:02
	#7 Consider appointment to the Workforce Development Board.	00:26:05
	Madam Chair, move to approve Ronald Cole to the Workforce Development Board.	00:26:09
	Second, it has been moved by Commissioner Maxie, second by Commissioner Pepler. Further discussion.	00:26:14
	All in favor say aye aye. Opposed say nay.	00:26:21
	Ron Cole will be appointed to the Workforce Development Board.	00:26:25
	Now goes to new business consider application for small business incentive program and authorized release of economic development	00:26:30
	trust funds Tier 1.	00:26:34
	Good morning, Max.	00:26:39
	Do you need more commissioners Maximated department planning services?	00:26:42
	The department has received a small business incentive program application from Mike Anderson, representing Anderson Baseball	00:26:50
	Academy.	00:26:53
	The small business provides individualized baseball skills and instruction to Northern Colorado youth between ages of seven and	00:26:56
	18.	00:27:00
	This business use was approved.	00:27:05
	Per Z Pack 23 zero 01/12.	00:27:07
	On October 23rd, 2024 for a private recreational facility.	00:27:10
	Anderson Baseball Academy is located at 33046 Pikes Peak Drive in Greeley. This is a small business with three employees.	00:27:15
	That qualifies as a tier one small business for the program criteria of 0 to 9 employees.	00:27:23
	The county fees that meet the criteria for reimbursement is a total of $10,369.21.	00:27:28
	According to the Small Business Incentive Program requirements.	00:27:36
	Again, is.	00:27:39
	Anderson Baseball Academy is eligible for the Tier 1, which is up to $20,000.	00:27:40
	Fee reimbursement.	00:27:45
	However, the applicant is obligated to cover the 1st 2500.	00:27:47
	Planning staff recommends approval of this Tier 1 application and respectfully request the Board of County Commissioners authorize	00:27:51
	and release.	00:27:54
	$7869.21 From the Economic Development Fund for Anderson Baseball Academy.	00:27:57
	All right. Any questions of the board?	00:28:04
	Yes, Commissioner Max.	00:28:09
	Madam Chair, Max, could you please repeat that total? I'm looking at the pass around and it's a little bit different. I just want	00:28:10
	to make sure I heard you right. Yeah. So actually the breakdown of the fee is land use fees is 1850, impact fees is 5577.	00:28:18
	And then the building permit fees is $2942.21.	00:28:26
	Equaling a total of $10,369.21.	00:28:31
	So that's the total and then they they upfront the 1st 2500.	00:28:37
	Which then we reimburse or?	00:28:42
	Requesting to reimburse $7869.21.	00:28:44
	Thank you. OK.	00:28:49
	All right. Any questions of the board?	00:28:51
	I'm sure I've moved.	00:28:54
	Prove the small business incentive program and release of economic development trust funds for Anderson Baseball Academy.	00:28:57
	Second, it has been moved by Commissioner Maxey, second by Commissioner Pepler. Further discussion.	00:29:05
	All in favor, say aye. Opposed say.	00:29:12
	That incentive for Anderson Baseball Academy is approved. Congratulations.	00:29:16
	Thanks.	00:29:21
	Very good, yes.	00:29:26
	I need to say thank you small old school.	00:29:29
	We're in Weld County and it says 8 to 18. The truth is that 8 year olds.	00:29:34
	Up to 28 we have Little Leaguers.	00:29:39
	We've had big leaguers in a barn.	00:29:41
	Just 4 miles from here.	00:29:43
	The Planning Commission, the planning through this whole thing has been.	00:29:45
	Been a challenge, but good. It's been great. We've changed some things.	00:29:49
	Just real thankful that we had this opportunity.	00:29:53
	And in the state of in the state of Colorado, we take a lot of pride of what we're doing with baseball in this community. So thank	00:29:55
	you guys very, very much. Thank you. Outstanding. We hope to see some Rockies players.	00:30:00
	Thank you.	00:30:07
	All right. That takes us to number 2 and this is involved.	00:30:08
	Having the vacation.	00:30:13
	The partial vacation vac 240028.	00:30:16
	I see the planning.	00:30:21
	Department is here to.	00:30:23
	Good morning, Commissioners. Lindsay Oliver, Department of Planning Services.	00:30:31
	For your consideration is the vacation of lot B of recorded exemption recx 20-0063.	00:30:36
	Recorded September 30th of 2020.	00:30:44
	This parcel is located South of and adjacent to County Road 88 and east of and adjacent to County Road 29.	00:30:47
	And is owned by Deborah and Justice Pettit.	00:30:55
	The vacation will result in an approximately 146 acre unflatted parcel.	00:30:58
	The applicant submitted a vacation request letter and a draft vacation map along with other supporting documentation to planning	00:31:04
	staff.	00:31:08
	Lot A of recx 20.	00:31:13
	0063 is not a part of this action.	00:31:16
	And no easements are impacted by this request.	00:31:19
	This vacation was heard last week on Wednesday, February 26.	00:31:23
	And was continuing to today because the owner of Lot A.	00:31:27
	Of RECX 2063 had concerns regarding an access on County Road 29.	00:31:31
	Approximately 515 feet South of Town Road 88.	00:31:38
	Which crosses the subject property.	00:31:42
	Staff has reviewed these concerns and found that the access in question was stated to be closed and reclaimed for the original	00:31:45
	recorded exemption flat in 2020.	00:31:49
	Based on site inspection by planning staff, the access in question has not been closed and reclaimed.	00:31:55
	Therefore, staff is recommending that the following condition be added.	00:32:01
	The access point onto County Road 29, located approximately 515 feet South of the intersection.	00:32:06
	Of County Road 29 and County Road 88.	00:32:14
	Does not meet the spacing requirement for an arterial Rd. This access shall be closed and reclaimed to be compliant with Section	00:32:17
	8-14-30I.	00:32:22
	And we're here to answer any questions.	00:32:28
	Right. Are there any questions of the planning department?	00:32:30
	I'll ask 1 moment Sir. Thank you.	00:32:36
	This I see what you're talking about. I'm looking at the property portal right now.	00:32:40
	The and if I get the I hope I get the.	00:32:45
	Lot A is a smaller lot.	00:32:49
	It was in question.	00:32:52
	That has a direct access.	00:32:54
	To the north on County Road 88 anyway, and so the access on 29.	00:32:56
	Excuse me, that's being that is being requested to have a condition foreclosure on that is kind of a secondary access and so we're	00:33:01
	still fulfilling our obligation to have one access per lot.	00:33:06
	Is what I'm getting at correct? Thank you.	00:33:11
	All right. Further questions with the planning Department. Well, I will open this up now to Mr. Pettit, If you could just state	00:33:15
	your name and address.	00:33:19
	Justice Pettit.	00:33:24
	14506 County Road 88.	00:33:25
	I own.	00:33:29
	Property that we're trying to get the.	00:33:31
	Change and lot designation.	00:33:33
	That access.	00:33:36
	Was to be closed off.	00:33:39
	For that homeowner.	00:33:41
	So he couldn't use it anymore.	00:33:43
	I'm asking you to not close that off for me.	00:33:47
	Because I need that access for that.	00:33:50
	Sprinkler Ponder.	00:33:53
	That's my only access to that sprinkler.	00:33:55
	OK. Are there any questions of the applicant?	00:33:58
	Yes, Commissioner Maxie. Well, I guess, doesn't that put us at odds with the Planning Department's recommendation?	00:34:02
	It does.	00:34:10
	We are recommending that access to be closed due to the proximity to the intersection. It doesn't meet the requirements for an	00:34:12
	arterial Rd.	00:34:16
	The applicant has another access further South on County Road 29.	00:34:21
	And that access.	00:34:28
	Is generally impeded.	00:34:30
	If you look at the map there you can see the.	00:34:34
	Color change.	00:34:38
	There's a valley right there and that is not a well drained area.	00:34:39
	So getting from there.	00:34:44
	Over to that sprinkler pound is almost impossible during the summer during irrigation months.	00:34:46
	The original recorded exemption.	00:35:02
	From 2020 was approved.	00:35:04
	Contingent upon the condition that.	00:35:07
	This access in question South of the intersection would be closed.	00:35:10
	And I think.	00:35:16
	There was probably an interpretation.	00:35:17
	Problem on that that the access would be denied to the homeowner.	00:35:20
	That's the way I took that.	00:35:27
	Oh, I see, Don Anderson, maybe you can shed some light.	00:35:32
	Good morning, Commissioners. Donnie Anderson, Department of Planning Services.	00:35:35
	I just want to reiterate what Lindsay said.	00:35:39
	In the recorded exemption, and I don't think Mr. Pettit owned it at the time.	00:35:42
	Had it far in, my apologies.	00:35:46
	So when the recorded exemption was done, that was approved based on.	00:35:49
	This access in question being closed and reclaimed and there being another southern access on County Road.	00:35:53
	29.	00:35:59
	That was called out on that plat that was recorded.	00:36:00
	The vacation flat for this case that he's trying to vacate.	00:36:04
	That access wasn't shown on the.	00:36:08
	So we were under the impression that that had been done last week when this came up again, sent staff out there and that Access	00:36:11
	still is.	00:36:15
	Being utilized.	00:36:20
	Hence the reason of requesting.	00:36:21
	A Co of A today.	00:36:24
	What excess are you talking about? The one that we're asking to be closer?	00:36:26
	That so.	00:36:32
	Currently that access is.	00:36:35
	I've got some panels across there.	00:36:40
	That was just to keep some keep the cattle in the in the pivot.	00:36:43
	Yes, I I used that access.	00:36:52
	In the summer months to access that palm.	00:36:55
	And it's going to be a.	00:36:58
	A big hindrance if this is taken away.	00:37:02
	Commissioner, excuse me, Let me clarify a couple things.	00:37:10
	Excuse me, Mr. Pettit, did you own the property when the court exemption was done?	00:37:17
	No. So you you bought this property with the condition already on it that that excess should have been closed.	00:37:21
	Yeah. And by my understanding it was closed up.	00:37:29
	That.	00:37:33
	The owner of the house.	00:37:35
	OK.	00:37:37
	And are you saying that the access further South which I see as well?	00:37:42
	That one cannot be used to access this pawn by using it and then driving north.	00:37:47
	It is very hard that.	00:37:52
	It is almost impassable to go from that access to the pod.	00:37:55
	On the property because it is.	00:38:00
	Not a well drained area.	00:38:02
	It's a.	00:38:04
	One other question coming back to staff.	00:38:11
	Can you tell me, I mean, what is the process if we put a stipulation like this on?	00:38:14
	A property owner is there any time period that staff is supposed to go back out and verify that something ACOA is?	00:38:20
	Actually adhered to that we place on a USR, or any case for that matter.	00:38:27
	So.	00:38:34
	Don Anderson.	00:38:38
	I would say typically in this case, we would want to see that it's closed and reclaimed prior to recording of the vacation flat.	00:38:39
	So that's how we would verify it. I would say in the past, maybe, you know, it wasn't a Co of A in the past. I mean it was very	00:38:46
	clear on the recorded extension plot that that access was to be closed and reclaimed.	00:38:52
	Not at the property of LA A.	00:38:57
	But at the roadway where we maintain it.	00:39:00
	And that reported Platt calls that out so.	00:39:03
	For us today, that's what we're asking for.	00:39:06
	Commissioner Maxie is.	00:39:09
	Prior to recording a vacation plat and we would confirm that that had been done.	00:39:10
	But during the original, during the recorded exemption, there's no.	00:39:15
	We put a COA on something and we say this is a condition.	00:39:20
	Of this RE.	00:39:24
	And then we don't have any sort of time frame that.	00:39:25
	Makes us, so to speak, go back out there and inspect that this has been done. We didn't know.	00:39:29
	Could you pull up the language on that RE real quick?	00:39:36
	I want to see how it's.	00:39:39
	Yeah, but I want he wants to see what's on the recorded.	00:39:47
	Is Jimmy Chord going on?	00:39:51
	Thank you.	00:40:05
	See this parts of Ears.	00:40:37
	Maybe.	00:40:41
	Commissioner, are you asking for the language on the plat?	00:40:55
	Whatever language stipulates closing of that access.	00:40:58
	OK, so this is the this is the staff report Max Dayer department planned services. So this is the staff report for RECX 20-0063.	00:41:02
	And we have prior so approved with conditions.	00:41:10
	We have 1:00 and 2:00.	00:41:13
	One is related to OWTS and then you have prior to recording the plat. So the applicant shall satisfy the concerns of the school	00:41:15
	district and then advocate shall address the concerns with.	00:41:19
	At the time public works.	00:41:25
	And then if you go to.	00:41:27
	The referral.	00:41:30
	The referral from.	00:41:33
	Public works.	00:41:35
	At the time.	00:41:36
	Back in 2020.	00:41:37
	It identifies the.	00:41:39
	Access situation. So you have access for proposed lot off of 88 which is up here.	00:41:42
	And then you have access to proposed light A as an existing not permitted access point off of 29.	00:41:48
	514 feet South of this intersection.	00:41:54
	And then does not meet the space requirement, the residential access point.	00:41:58
	It doesn't mean it. And then it should be closed and reclaimed.	00:42:04
	For this section.	00:42:07
	In terms of the condition that we want to add, it's very redundant for the sake of this. It mirrors essentially what was was asked	00:42:09
	back in 2020.	00:42:13
	And then this was again.	00:42:18
	This condition is reflected.	00:42:20
	In this staff report as staff and shall address concerns.	00:42:24
	Was there a map recorded with this?	00:42:30
	Yes. Does it stipulate that on the map?	00:42:32
	Yeah, I can jump in. Dan Campbell, Development Review and Planning Services.	00:42:35
	Yeah. So the recorded exemption plan does have a label.	00:42:39
	Saying that the X point.	00:42:44
	Is to be closed and reclaimed.	00:42:46
	And it was recorded with that label.	00:42:49
	Access point.	00:42:53
	To be closed and reclaimed per county. What request?	00:42:55
	And this axis is not is not permitted.	00:43:02
	Right, and it's and it's access point is also part of the.	00:43:07
	County Road 29 access control plan.	00:43:11
	And it is marked as.	00:43:15
	Having a safety concern?	00:43:17
	On that plan as well.	00:43:19
	And this map was recorded when.	00:43:22
	September of 2020.	00:43:25
	And that was prior to Mr. Pettit purchasing the property, correct?	00:43:27
	So it would have come up in any sort of land purchase title research.	00:43:32
	That's correct.	00:43:38
	So it hasn't been closed.	00:43:41
	Mr. Pettit has been using it thinking that it was an access to that pond which is right there.	00:43:44
	We're wanting to.	00:43:50
	Reiterate the closure on this.	00:43:52
	Partial vacation that's in front of us right now.	00:43:55
	What assurance will we have that if we approve that, that it will actually be closed?	00:43:58
	Commissioner, I hate to approve something for the second time. If it was approved once and it's supposed to be closed and it	00:44:05
	hasn't been closed, I mean, who's to say it's?	00:44:10
	I appreciate that. Like I said, I think staff sitting up here involved in the case is committed to saying prior to recording the	00:44:14
	vacation flat.	00:44:18
	Which we would do an inspection and make sure that that's done before we allow that to move forward.	00:44:23
	And has this been something that's been talked about with Mr. Pettit throughout the process of this partial vacation that is under	00:44:27
	his name?	00:44:30
	I would say.	00:44:34
	No, like I said, I think when the staff stuff came in.	00:44:36
	The vacation plot that he submitted did not include that access, so.	00:44:41
	Again, staff.	00:44:45
	Probably wrongly without going out there before.	00:44:47
	Assumed that that had been done based on the recorded exemption plan.	00:44:50
	Madam Chair, thank you for letting me just kind of dialogue my, I think my last comment for right now is more directed towards Mr.	00:44:56
	Pettit. Mr. Pettit, it's.	00:45:00
	It's tough for me to.	00:45:05
	Go against Staffs recommendation when we have something that very clearly back in 2020 was requested.	00:45:07
	By the person who was filing that plant that's on the screen right now.	00:45:14
	Throughout the entire process, was requested to be closed, and it's on a map that is.	00:45:18
	That is publicly viewable. That is a part of a chain of title when somebody purchases or sells a property.	00:45:23
	And I guess, you know, when I, when I purchase a property, it's it's on me to make sure that I understand the stipulations of that	00:45:30
	property.	00:45:34
	And I'm just telling you this because I just, I want you to understand where I'm sitting at right now.	00:45:38
	If that wouldn't have been on the map.	00:45:42
	You know, then I would have had a little, a little harder time.	00:45:45
	With this because it's not as publicly viewable, but.	00:45:49
	When it's on a recorded map, that is something that is a part of a property that you purchased.	00:45:52
	Which I don't know when you purchased it, but it was after 2020. That's that's where I'm struggling a little bit with not saying	00:45:57
	that it needs to be closed per staff's recommendation. I just want to be upfront with you on that when it's.	00:46:03
	To be reclaimed.	00:46:09
	Who is it actually to be reclaimed to?	00:46:11
	Because.	00:46:14
	I'm now the property owner of that.	00:46:16
	Area where the access is.	00:46:19
	What? Where is it to be reclaimed? Is it actually reclaimed by the county or reclaimed by me?	00:46:24
	Because the access was given.	00:46:31
	To that house that was there.	00:46:33
	That was the whole.	00:46:36
	Access and also it was an access point for a ditch that used to run down on there.	00:46:37
	To an adjoining property so.	00:46:44
	It not only effects.	00:46:46
	Me, but there was a ditch. It's now an underground line for a water line.	00:46:48
	Feeding another farm.	00:46:54
	But that was an access for that also.	00:46:56
	So this whole.	00:47:01
	It doesn't just affect me, it affects the next property owner to the east and.	00:47:03
	Yeah. And I definitely can appreciate that, Sir. I guess my question is, is, is if that that's the case, why did the prior owner	00:47:07
	of this, who did this record exemption not have the same concerns because they went through the same process with our staff and	00:47:12
	and they.	00:47:17
	Agreed to it because they signed this plan. So why did they not have the same concerns? Probably because.	00:47:22
	In my world something like this should be a non issue.	00:47:30
	But as I guess, as the county grows and.	00:47:34
	We have different ideas about things.	00:47:38
	It becomes an issue so.	00:47:40
	Well, I appreciate the dialogue and and overall.	00:47:43
	What I'm hearing it comes down to safety.	00:47:50
	And 29 is an active Rd.	00:47:53
	So.	00:47:57
	I think we need to.	00:48:00
	Support the planning department.	00:48:03
	What are my options on getting to my pond?	00:48:07
	And I don't know if you.	00:48:13
	Talk to the.	00:48:15
	Staff after this but.	00:48:17
	And again, that was just my comments. Commissioner Pepper, do you have any comments?	00:48:20
	I was wondering if we should look at continuing this and discussion with planning as far as making sure he does have his proper	00:48:25
	access.	00:48:29
	Well, I think Commissioners, I mean, I heard that there is another access further down, but I also heard Mr. Pettit's concerns	00:48:34
	that that access.	00:48:38
	May not.	00:48:42
	Be in the best spot due to a marshy I think is the word you use Sir. A marshy area that he would have to traverse.	00:48:44
	To get back up to that pond.	00:48:52
	I mean, in the agricultural world, a recharge pond or a pond like this to serve this pivot that which I'm sure is what it's for,	00:48:56
	you have to, he has to have access to it.	00:49:01
	I think from from my standpoint there is access to the property, it's just is it in the right spot to get him access to his pond?	00:49:05
	Can I interject? I'll just ask a question of Don.	00:49:14
	The You know, it seems that Mister Pettit is concerned about his.	00:49:19
	Access for his property which is agricultural.	00:49:25
	In nature.	00:49:31
	It's he's perfectly fine with.	00:49:32
	Closing off the residential access to the other lot.	00:49:36
	But that so the access.	00:49:41
	Would be virtually his.	00:49:44
	To get to the property.	00:49:47
	For him to be able to access the pond that's there.	00:49:49
	Is that correct? Yeah, it is.	00:49:55
	Cut off to the property.	00:49:59
	It is cut off to the house right now, so the I would say.	00:50:01
	And commissioners.	00:50:06
	He does have a lot of frontage along 29. Again, 29 does have an access control plan that we need to meet.	00:50:08
	But also.	00:50:16
	29 is an arterial roadway, so we've got specific code criteria with spacing from intersections and that's just not being neat so.	00:50:18
	Access staff would be willing if there's another area that meets World County code or a different location on his frontage.	00:50:27
	That meets the code for safety criteria. We'd be willing to look at that, but.	00:50:35
	But the one in question today does not meet the ACP nor.	00:50:40
	The safety criteria at the time.	00:50:44
	It appears there's a residential access on the West side of 29. What if Mr. Pettit access was moved about 190 feet South and was	00:50:46
	straight across from that other access?	00:50:51
	It was still.	00:50:56
	Access directly into the corner, not into the pivot.	00:50:57
	Maybe that would be a benefit to access still directly into that corner for Mr. Pettit that it would also.	00:51:02
	Moving further South, that's that's an idea.	00:51:07
	I think I'll turn it in that that is an idea and it does meet the 660 foot spacing from the intersection. So again, we're we're	00:51:10
	willing to work on him if there is a better.	00:51:16
	So as a the chair, I I don't want to make a rash decision. I think this needs.	00:51:21
	More diving in.	00:51:26
	If you don't mind, I would request that someone makes a motion to continue it.	00:51:28
	And if we can get a date from the.	00:51:33
	So.	00:51:35
	I would much rather.	00:51:41
	Get this moved along on the vacation lot designations.	00:51:44
	There's.	00:51:51
	This is the first step in trying to get a farm Family Division for my daughter.	00:51:54
	Is what all this is.	00:51:59
	And it's just a first step to do a farm Family Division.	00:52:01
	All right, so I don't want to delay them.	00:52:06
	So why don't you do what you need to do?	00:52:11
	So this doesn't get delayed on their end.	00:52:15
	I will talk with the Planning Commission, hopefully they are.	00:52:19
	Workable on this situation.	00:52:22
	So is this something that we can put back on the calendar on Wednesday?	00:52:27
	I don't think on Wednesday, but my question to Mr. Pettit's point, is this something Max or or Don or whomever that that this move	00:52:31
	of the access potentially can be part of the family farm division?	00:52:36
	So today as it is right now, and then the.	00:52:44
	We could maybe talk about the recess move.	00:52:47
	So again, it's going to depend on what his request is and where the access point is for the residential. So what I hear him say	00:52:50
	he's going to do a family farm division.	00:52:54
	Which will essentially be a request eventually somewhere on the property.	00:52:59
	For residential access points. So we'll certainly evaluate that at that time.	00:53:04
	Right, right. I'm just wondering if it could be a part of that request so that we're not coming back again and then again, you	00:53:10
	know what I mean? Yeah, good point.	00:53:14
	Yes, I don't want to delay them, so I'm willing to.	00:53:19
	To work with the Planning Commission on this.	00:53:24
	If they're willing to work all right, does the planning staff have a time frame on or Mr. Pettit or?	00:53:28
	Where we're going and how quickly and.	00:53:36
	What he's suggesting is that you go ahead and approve it today and then he'll be able to move forward with his.	00:53:38
	Application for the family farm division.	00:53:45
	And work it out with respect to any other AG access.	00:53:48
	That he may need on the property. OK. And Commissioners, we will continue to work with them. So if you approve this today with	00:53:53
	this one being closed during claim, Jason, you just put an option on the table, we will certainly still look at that.	00:53:59
	We can still issue an access permit that meets of county code if it's not in that other location. The code allows us to do that,	00:54:05
	so we will certainly work with him on it.	00:54:10
	I appreciate, Commissioner Max, you're coming up with an alternative.	00:54:15
	I guess with, with what's been said then Mr. Pettit, it sounds like you're all right with us going ahead and approving this	00:54:19
	partial vacation today to allow you to move forward with the other part. And and you're well aware of what we've been talking	00:54:23
	about and I truly appreciate the dialogue and you telling us some of the concerns and.	00:54:27
	I guess, as one, Commissioner, I just would ask that you continue to work with staff on this access point move, because	00:54:32
	technically today if we.	00:54:36
	If we approve this.	00:54:39
	Then that access point is not.	00:54:41
	Not allowed where it's at. So I appreciate that. And Madam Chair, with all the dialogue and discussion, I would go ahead and move	00:54:43
	that we approve the partial vacation VC24-0028.	00:54:49
	Record exemption RAC X20-0063 for removal of Lot B Justice and Deborah Pettit.	00:54:55
	Back it up. It has been. That's where the condition.	00:55:01
	Of closing, that was what was being suggested. I apologize. I thought that was in the recommendation already. It's not okay then	00:55:06
	yes, with the condition.	00:55:11
	Of the access.	00:55:17
	And I'll second that.	00:55:19
	All right. It has been moved by Commissioner Maxie, second by Commissioner Pepler for the discussion.	00:55:21
	All in favor say aye aye. Opposed say nay.	00:55:27
	That resolution is approved. And yes, Mr. Credit, I appreciate you being here.	00:55:29
	We hope to have an alternative for you, Sir.	00:55:34
	OK. Thank you.	00:55:38
	It comes now for public comment. Each individual speaker is allowed a 3 minute period in time which to direct comments to the	00:55:40
	Board. The Chair shall enforce the rules of order and decorum and will not accept comments regarding matters which are scheduled	00:55:45
	to be considered at future public hearing, such as land use hearing.	00:55:51
	In that event, the speaker will be asked to give their testimony at the appropriate public hearing, either in person or in	00:55:57
	writing.	00:56:00
	Pursuant to the rules set forth in Section 2-1-20 dot E of the Well County Code.	00:56:04
	See no one in the audience. This meeting is adjourned. Thank you.	00:56:10

* you need to log in to manage your favorites

Agenda
Minutes
Transcript

* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document

Transcript search

Transcript

	Count 3. Can we please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance? Thank.	00:11:37
	I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.	00:11:41
	And to the Republic, for which it says 1 nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.	00:11:45
	Good morning. It's Monday, March 3rd, 2025, 9:00. Will County board hearings roll call please? Jason Maxie, Lynette Pepler present	00:11:55
	Kevin Ross.	00:12:00
	Scott James excused Harry Buck here.	00:12:06
	All right, let the record reflect that three out of five commissioners are here.	00:12:10
	Amendments to the agenda.	00:12:15
	We have any amendments, Houston? No, ma'am.	00:12:17
	All right, that brings us to consent agenda.	00:12:19
	We have a partial vacation. Partial vacation V AC24-0028.	00:12:23
	Of A2 lot recorded exemption.	00:12:29
	R EC X2O-0063 for removal of lot B and Justice and Deborah Pettit.	00:12:31
	Is there anyone here that would like to speak regarding this partial vacation?	00:12:38
	Umm, I see a.	00:12:44
	Yes, we have.	00:12:45
	2 individuals.	00:12:47
	Justice had it.	00:12:48
	We need you to come up to the mic, Sir.	00:12:50
	What you need to do is.	00:12:52
	Go ahead and just take it off because staff has some.	00:12:55
	Yes, to add so then we can.	00:12:59
	Added to the regular agenda and then call it up and down.	00:13:02
	So right now, my understanding is public hearing for anybody to take this off of consent, that's all we're doing is.	00:13:07
	OK. And I guess the recommendation of staff is to go ahead and do that anyway because there are some things that staff needs to	00:13:14
	talk about.	00:13:19
	OK. Do I need to make a motion on that? Do we have to have a motion? Yes, I think we do.	00:13:24
	OK, Madam Chair, I move to.	00:13:29
	Move vacation 240028 out of the consent agenda.	00:13:32
	It has been moved by Commissioner Pepper, second by Commissioner Maxie.	00:13:38
	Any discussion?	00:13:43
	All in favor say aye aye. Opposed say nay.	00:13:45
	So we don't need Mr. Petter right now? No, we will not. So.	00:13:48
	You'll call it back up and then you can come up and talk.	00:13:53
	OK. So we were going to put that though.	00:13:57
	In the new business planning, right, you can do that.	00:14:01
	So it will be the, I guess the chairs prerogative to put that in the new business planning #2.	00:14:06
	OK, that.	00:14:13
	Takes us to warrants. General warrants February 26th, 27th and 28th, 2025.	00:14:15
	Madam Chair, move to approve the general warrants for February 26th, 27th and 28th for 2025. Commissioner Waxy, second by	00:14:21
	Commissioner Pepler. Further discussion.	00:14:26
	All in favor say aye aye. Opposed say nay.	00:14:32
	Those general warrants are approved. Good morning, Toby. Good morning. Present bid B 2500014 Multi jurisdiction jurisdictional.	00:14:35
	Hazard mitigation plan update. Office of Emergency Management.	00:14:46
	Good morning, Toby Taylor with purchasing.	00:14:51
	3 vendors have replied to the solicitation. The Office of Emergency Management are reviewing those replies and anticipates	00:14:53
	bringing a recommendation to the Board on March 17th, 2025. All right, any questions of the Board?	00:14:59
	OK #2 Present bid B 250-0017 Erosion control and revisitation services, Department of Public Works.	00:15:06
	7 vendors have replied to the solicitation. The Department of Public Works are reviewing those replies and anticipates bringing a	00:15:16
	recommendation to the Board on March 17th, 2025. All right and #3 present bid B 250-0022.	00:15:24
	Boiler and piping replacement for alternative programs building facilities department.	00:15:32
	3 vendors have replied to the solicitation. The Facilities Department are reviewing those replies and anticipates bringing a	00:15:37
	recommendation to the Board on March 17th, 2025. All right. Thank you very much, Sir.	00:15:42
	That brings us to new Business General.	00:15:49
	Consider amendment number six to agreement for services for motor vehicles self-service kiosk and authorized chair to sign	00:15:51
	Intellectual Technology Inc. Good morning, Rudy.	00:15:56
	Good morning, Rudy Santos, Chief Deputy Will County Clerk and Recorders Office.	00:16:02
	This is a.	00:16:07
	What's the?	00:16:11
	I would ask him to.	00:16:14
	Have the chair respectfully sign the agreement.	00:16:16
	To amend the contract that we currently have with our motor vehicle kiosks.	00:16:19
	Currently we have three of them, two of them here at the King Soopers and West Greeley.	00:16:23
	And when the Firestone at the King Soopers there.	00:16:28
	They're upgrading the technology with new credit card readers and.	00:16:31
	The old ones are only swipe to pay.	00:16:36
	The new ones have an actual tap to pay as well as.	00:16:38
	Newer technologies like Apple Pay, Google Pay, Samsung Pay.	00:16:42
	Cool. Any questions at the board move to approve the resolution. Second, it has been moved by Commissioner Maxey. Second, by	00:16:47
	Commissioner Pepler.	00:16:51
	Further discussion.	00:16:55
	All in favor, Say aye. Aye. Opposed say nay. Madam Chair, did the board approve the rest of the consent agenda? No. I was going to	00:16:57
	do that.	00:17:01
	OK, so we can do it now. You want me to do it now? OK.	00:17:06
	Let's go back. I apologize to the consent agenda.	00:17:10
	Can I get a motion to approve the consent agenda?	00:17:15
	It has been moved by Commissioner Maxie, second by Commissioner Pepper.	00:17:18
	On further discussion.	00:17:22
	All in favor, say aye. Opposed say nay.	00:17:24
	Consent agenda is approved. I apologize again.	00:17:27
	Going back to new business #2 consider country.	00:17:31
	Thank you. Thank you.	00:17:35
	Consider contract ID 9136 Memorandum of Agreement to purchase property interest for right of way acquisition for county Roads 13	00:17:37
	and 54 intersection roundabout project northwest corner and authorized chair design. Loveland ready mix concrete ink. Good	00:17:43
	morning.	00:17:49
	Good morning, Clay. Canon Public Works.	00:17:55
	This Memorandum of Agreement is for the purchase of.	00:17:57
	Property from.	00:18:03
	Loveland writing mix in Larimer County.	00:18:05
	For the.	00:18:08
	County Road 5413 roundabout that sits right on the.	00:18:10
	The border.	00:18:16
	Between us.	00:18:17
	So we're acquiring right of way.	00:18:19
	In Larimer County.	00:18:22
	And then the deed will be in Larimer counties name.	00:18:23
	The cost of this project or?	00:18:29
	This right of way.	00:18:32
	Is $512,277.50.	00:18:35
	Plus closing costs.	00:18:40
	At this point, I don't know what the closing costs will be generally there in the neighborhood of.	00:18:42
	One to $2000.	00:18:47
	I can't get a closing cost until I get a closing date.	00:18:50
	And so everything is predicated on the closing date.	00:18:54
	Which we can't get till we have an assigned agreement.	00:18:58
	The attorneys office has reviewed the.	00:19:03
	Agreement and Loveland Remix assigned it.	00:19:06
	And we have the funds allocated in our 2025.	00:19:10
	Budget.	00:19:15
	I'm answering questions.	00:19:17
	All right. Are there any questions on the board?	00:19:19
	I'll make a motion to approve contract. ID 9136. Second, it has been moved by Commissioner Maxie. Second by Commissioner Pepper.	00:19:22
	Further discussion.	00:19:26
	All in favor, say aye. Opposed say nay.	00:19:31
	Contract ID 9136 is approved.	00:19:34
	#3 Consider contract ID 9146 Memorandum of Agreement to purchase property interest for right of way acquisition for the County	00:19:37
	Roads 13 and 54 intersection.	00:19:43
	Roundabout project southwest corner and authorized chair to sign Loveland rather mix concrete ink.	00:19:49
	Good morning. Good morning, Clay County Public Works.	00:19:56
	This agreement is.	00:19:59
	Similar to the same one that's owned by the same property owner, Loveland Ready Mix.	00:20:03
	It's also located in Larimer County, so we're acquiring.	00:20:08
	Right of way on behalf of Larimer County.	00:20:12
	The cost for this is 458,800.	00:20:15
	$86 and zero cents plus closing costs.	00:20:20
	I didn't answer any questions.	00:20:26
	All right. Are there any questions of the board?	00:20:28
	Make a motion to approve contract ID 9146 Second.	00:20:31
	And has been moved by Commissioner Maxie, seconded by Commissioner Pepler. Further discussion.	00:20:35
	Say aye. Opposed, say nay.	00:20:41
	Contract ID 9146 is approved #4 Consider Contract ID 9151. Memorandum of Agreement to purchase property interest.	00:20:43
	A right away acquisition for County Roads 13 and 54 intersection roundabout project.	00:20:52
	Northeast Corner and authorized chair to sign Croissant Family Farms, LLC.	00:20:58
	Good morning, Clay County Public Works.	00:21:04
	This.	00:21:06
	Is for a much smaller parcel for the.	00:21:08
	5413.	00:21:11
	Roundabout it is.	00:21:13
	A permanent easement.	00:21:16
	And a temporary easement that we have to acquire on.	00:21:17
	Behalf of Public Service of Colorado.	00:21:21
	We're building a road over their existing easement, so we have to replace it.	00:21:26
	And pay them to move into their new easement.	00:21:30
	Umm, this agreement was sent around in a pass around.	00:21:33
	And returned on January 9th.	00:21:39
	We had asked that we'd be able to negotiate up to $7500.	00:21:44
	At that time and after negotiating with Mr. Croissant.	00:21:50
	We came to a $5547.31.	00:21:55
	I do realize there's.	00:22:02
	Some questions.	00:22:04
	Potentially on the agreement itself.	00:22:05
	Where some totals have been crossed out and.	00:22:09
	Handwritten men.	00:22:13
	And that.	00:22:14
	Rather than having a new memorandum of agreement.	00:22:16
	Sent out to this landowner.	00:22:20
	We're following the cdot process for.	00:22:22
	How they want to see.	00:22:25
	The changes.	00:22:28
	To an MOA documented.	00:22:30
	So, umm.	00:22:32
	Each party has to initial.	00:22:34
	So the owner.	00:22:37
	Mitshoff, Who's our right of agent?	00:22:40
	Initialed and then when this agreement gets signed.	00:22:42
	If it gets signed, the board chair will have to sign initially as well.	00:22:45
	Thank you for clarifying that through.	00:22:51
	All right. Any other questions at the board?	00:22:54
	I move to approve contract. ID 9151. It has been moved by Commissioner Pepler, second by Commissioner Maxie. Further discussion.	00:22:58
	All in favor, Say aye. Opposed, say nay. Contract ID 9151 is approved. Thank you.	00:23:06
	#5 consider three party tender agreement and full release between surgery, bond or surety.	00:23:14
	Company and oblige or.	00:23:21
	Law administration, elevator monetization project and authorized chair to sign DZ Mod, Lift company and Capital Indemnity	00:23:25
	Corporation.	00:23:30
	Madam Chair, this item and the next one are sort of tied together.	00:23:35
	Very similar, if not identical, but different projects.	00:23:41
	So this one is for the elevator in the law Administration building.	00:23:45
	The next one, and through the elevator. A elevator.	00:23:51
	In the jail.	00:23:55
	OK, so.	00:23:57
	The company that had been hired.	00:23:59
	To do the work on both projects.	00:24:01
	Is gone.	00:24:07
	We're not sure where, but is gone.	00:24:08
	The bond.	00:24:11
	A company has arranged with Dzmod Lift Company.	00:24:12
	To come in and do the work.	00:24:18
	And the extra expense for both projects.	00:24:21
	Is going to be paid for by Capital Indemnity Corporation, a bond company.	00:24:26
	So with this agreement does, in the next agreement does.	00:24:33
	Is make it so that we can.	00:24:38
	Agree with.	00:24:41
	DZ mod Capital One demo incorporation.	00:24:43
	For them to go ahead and take care of them and complete the projects.	00:24:47
	That the other company.	00:24:52
	Was supposed to do.	00:24:55
	So peak elevator was.	00:24:58
	Previous company that is.	00:25:01
	Gone. So we would recommend approval of both agreements.	00:25:04
	All right. Are there any questions on the board?	00:25:10
	Madam Chair, I've moved to approve the resolution for DZ Mod Company to, you know, help with the law administration elevator as	00:25:14
	per the.	00:25:19
	For the item on the agenda.	00:25:24
	Second, it has been moved by Commissioner Maxie, second by Commissioner Pepper. Further discussion.	00:25:26
	All in favor, Say aye. Opposed say no.	00:25:32
	That resolution passes and then.	00:25:35
	Number six, consider three party tender agreement and full release between Surety company and Abagi for jail.	00:25:37
	Elevator modernization project and authorized chair design.	00:25:44
	DZ, mod lift company and capital endemic.	00:25:48
	Indemnity Corporation resolution.	00:25:51
	Second, it has been moved by Commissioner Maxie, second by Commissioner Petler.	00:25:54
	Further discussion.	00:25:58
	All in favor, say aye. Opposed say nay.	00:26:00
	That resolution is passed.	00:26:02
	#7 Consider appointment to the Workforce Development Board.	00:26:05
	Madam Chair, move to approve Ronald Cole to the Workforce Development Board.	00:26:09
	Second, it has been moved by Commissioner Maxie, second by Commissioner Pepler. Further discussion.	00:26:14
	All in favor say aye aye. Opposed say nay.	00:26:21
	Ron Cole will be appointed to the Workforce Development Board.	00:26:25
	Now goes to new business consider application for small business incentive program and authorized release of economic development	00:26:30
	trust funds Tier 1.	00:26:34
	Good morning, Max.	00:26:39
	Do you need more commissioners Maximated department planning services?	00:26:42
	The department has received a small business incentive program application from Mike Anderson, representing Anderson Baseball	00:26:50
	Academy.	00:26:53
	The small business provides individualized baseball skills and instruction to Northern Colorado youth between ages of seven and	00:26:56
	18.	00:27:00
	This business use was approved.	00:27:05
	Per Z Pack 23 zero 01/12.	00:27:07
	On October 23rd, 2024 for a private recreational facility.	00:27:10
	Anderson Baseball Academy is located at 33046 Pikes Peak Drive in Greeley. This is a small business with three employees.	00:27:15
	That qualifies as a tier one small business for the program criteria of 0 to 9 employees.	00:27:23
	The county fees that meet the criteria for reimbursement is a total of $10,369.21.	00:27:28
	According to the Small Business Incentive Program requirements.	00:27:36
	Again, is.	00:27:39
	Anderson Baseball Academy is eligible for the Tier 1, which is up to $20,000.	00:27:40
	Fee reimbursement.	00:27:45
	However, the applicant is obligated to cover the 1st 2500.	00:27:47
	Planning staff recommends approval of this Tier 1 application and respectfully request the Board of County Commissioners authorize	00:27:51
	and release.	00:27:54
	$7869.21 From the Economic Development Fund for Anderson Baseball Academy.	00:27:57
	All right. Any questions of the board?	00:28:04
	Yes, Commissioner Max.	00:28:09
	Madam Chair, Max, could you please repeat that total? I'm looking at the pass around and it's a little bit different. I just want	00:28:10
	to make sure I heard you right. Yeah. So actually the breakdown of the fee is land use fees is 1850, impact fees is 5577.	00:28:18
	And then the building permit fees is $2942.21.	00:28:26
	Equaling a total of $10,369.21.	00:28:31
	So that's the total and then they they upfront the 1st 2500.	00:28:37
	Which then we reimburse or?	00:28:42
	Requesting to reimburse $7869.21.	00:28:44
	Thank you. OK.	00:28:49
	All right. Any questions of the board?	00:28:51
	I'm sure I've moved.	00:28:54
	Prove the small business incentive program and release of economic development trust funds for Anderson Baseball Academy.	00:28:57
	Second, it has been moved by Commissioner Maxey, second by Commissioner Pepler. Further discussion.	00:29:05
	All in favor, say aye. Opposed say.	00:29:12
	That incentive for Anderson Baseball Academy is approved. Congratulations.	00:29:16
	Thanks.	00:29:21
	Very good, yes.	00:29:26
	I need to say thank you small old school.	00:29:29
	We're in Weld County and it says 8 to 18. The truth is that 8 year olds.	00:29:34
	Up to 28 we have Little Leaguers.	00:29:39
	We've had big leaguers in a barn.	00:29:41
	Just 4 miles from here.	00:29:43
	The Planning Commission, the planning through this whole thing has been.	00:29:45
	Been a challenge, but good. It's been great. We've changed some things.	00:29:49
	Just real thankful that we had this opportunity.	00:29:53
	And in the state of in the state of Colorado, we take a lot of pride of what we're doing with baseball in this community. So thank	00:29:55
	you guys very, very much. Thank you. Outstanding. We hope to see some Rockies players.	00:30:00
	Thank you.	00:30:07
	All right. That takes us to number 2 and this is involved.	00:30:08
	Having the vacation.	00:30:13
	The partial vacation vac 240028.	00:30:16
	I see the planning.	00:30:21
	Department is here to.	00:30:23
	Good morning, Commissioners. Lindsay Oliver, Department of Planning Services.	00:30:31
	For your consideration is the vacation of lot B of recorded exemption recx 20-0063.	00:30:36
	Recorded September 30th of 2020.	00:30:44
	This parcel is located South of and adjacent to County Road 88 and east of and adjacent to County Road 29.	00:30:47
	And is owned by Deborah and Justice Pettit.	00:30:55
	The vacation will result in an approximately 146 acre unflatted parcel.	00:30:58
	The applicant submitted a vacation request letter and a draft vacation map along with other supporting documentation to planning	00:31:04
	staff.	00:31:08
	Lot A of recx 20.	00:31:13
	0063 is not a part of this action.	00:31:16
	And no easements are impacted by this request.	00:31:19
	This vacation was heard last week on Wednesday, February 26.	00:31:23
	And was continuing to today because the owner of Lot A.	00:31:27
	Of RECX 2063 had concerns regarding an access on County Road 29.	00:31:31
	Approximately 515 feet South of Town Road 88.	00:31:38
	Which crosses the subject property.	00:31:42
	Staff has reviewed these concerns and found that the access in question was stated to be closed and reclaimed for the original	00:31:45
	recorded exemption flat in 2020.	00:31:49
	Based on site inspection by planning staff, the access in question has not been closed and reclaimed.	00:31:55
	Therefore, staff is recommending that the following condition be added.	00:32:01
	The access point onto County Road 29, located approximately 515 feet South of the intersection.	00:32:06
	Of County Road 29 and County Road 88.	00:32:14
	Does not meet the spacing requirement for an arterial Rd. This access shall be closed and reclaimed to be compliant with Section	00:32:17
	8-14-30I.	00:32:22
	And we're here to answer any questions.	00:32:28
	Right. Are there any questions of the planning department?	00:32:30
	I'll ask 1 moment Sir. Thank you.	00:32:36
	This I see what you're talking about. I'm looking at the property portal right now.	00:32:40
	The and if I get the I hope I get the.	00:32:45
	Lot A is a smaller lot.	00:32:49
	It was in question.	00:32:52
	That has a direct access.	00:32:54
	To the north on County Road 88 anyway, and so the access on 29.	00:32:56
	Excuse me, that's being that is being requested to have a condition foreclosure on that is kind of a secondary access and so we're	00:33:01
	still fulfilling our obligation to have one access per lot.	00:33:06
	Is what I'm getting at correct? Thank you.	00:33:11
	All right. Further questions with the planning Department. Well, I will open this up now to Mr. Pettit, If you could just state	00:33:15
	your name and address.	00:33:19
	Justice Pettit.	00:33:24
	14506 County Road 88.	00:33:25
	I own.	00:33:29
	Property that we're trying to get the.	00:33:31
	Change and lot designation.	00:33:33
	That access.	00:33:36
	Was to be closed off.	00:33:39
	For that homeowner.	00:33:41
	So he couldn't use it anymore.	00:33:43
	I'm asking you to not close that off for me.	00:33:47
	Because I need that access for that.	00:33:50
	Sprinkler Ponder.	00:33:53
	That's my only access to that sprinkler.	00:33:55
	OK. Are there any questions of the applicant?	00:33:58
	Yes, Commissioner Maxie. Well, I guess, doesn't that put us at odds with the Planning Department's recommendation?	00:34:02
	It does.	00:34:10
	We are recommending that access to be closed due to the proximity to the intersection. It doesn't meet the requirements for an	00:34:12
	arterial Rd.	00:34:16
	The applicant has another access further South on County Road 29.	00:34:21
	And that access.	00:34:28
	Is generally impeded.	00:34:30
	If you look at the map there you can see the.	00:34:34
	Color change.	00:34:38
	There's a valley right there and that is not a well drained area.	00:34:39
	So getting from there.	00:34:44
	Over to that sprinkler pound is almost impossible during the summer during irrigation months.	00:34:46
	The original recorded exemption.	00:35:02
	From 2020 was approved.	00:35:04
	Contingent upon the condition that.	00:35:07
	This access in question South of the intersection would be closed.	00:35:10
	And I think.	00:35:16
	There was probably an interpretation.	00:35:17
	Problem on that that the access would be denied to the homeowner.	00:35:20
	That's the way I took that.	00:35:27
	Oh, I see, Don Anderson, maybe you can shed some light.	00:35:32
	Good morning, Commissioners. Donnie Anderson, Department of Planning Services.	00:35:35
	I just want to reiterate what Lindsay said.	00:35:39
	In the recorded exemption, and I don't think Mr. Pettit owned it at the time.	00:35:42
	Had it far in, my apologies.	00:35:46
	So when the recorded exemption was done, that was approved based on.	00:35:49
	This access in question being closed and reclaimed and there being another southern access on County Road.	00:35:53
	29.	00:35:59
	That was called out on that plat that was recorded.	00:36:00
	The vacation flat for this case that he's trying to vacate.	00:36:04
	That access wasn't shown on the.	00:36:08
	So we were under the impression that that had been done last week when this came up again, sent staff out there and that Access	00:36:11
	still is.	00:36:15
	Being utilized.	00:36:20
	Hence the reason of requesting.	00:36:21
	A Co of A today.	00:36:24
	What excess are you talking about? The one that we're asking to be closer?	00:36:26
	That so.	00:36:32
	Currently that access is.	00:36:35
	I've got some panels across there.	00:36:40
	That was just to keep some keep the cattle in the in the pivot.	00:36:43
	Yes, I I used that access.	00:36:52
	In the summer months to access that palm.	00:36:55
	And it's going to be a.	00:36:58
	A big hindrance if this is taken away.	00:37:02
	Commissioner, excuse me, Let me clarify a couple things.	00:37:10
	Excuse me, Mr. Pettit, did you own the property when the court exemption was done?	00:37:17
	No. So you you bought this property with the condition already on it that that excess should have been closed.	00:37:21
	Yeah. And by my understanding it was closed up.	00:37:29
	That.	00:37:33
	The owner of the house.	00:37:35
	OK.	00:37:37
	And are you saying that the access further South which I see as well?	00:37:42
	That one cannot be used to access this pawn by using it and then driving north.	00:37:47
	It is very hard that.	00:37:52
	It is almost impassable to go from that access to the pod.	00:37:55
	On the property because it is.	00:38:00
	Not a well drained area.	00:38:02
	It's a.	00:38:04
	One other question coming back to staff.	00:38:11
	Can you tell me, I mean, what is the process if we put a stipulation like this on?	00:38:14
	A property owner is there any time period that staff is supposed to go back out and verify that something ACOA is?	00:38:20
	Actually adhered to that we place on a USR, or any case for that matter.	00:38:27
	So.	00:38:34
	Don Anderson.	00:38:38
	I would say typically in this case, we would want to see that it's closed and reclaimed prior to recording of the vacation flat.	00:38:39
	So that's how we would verify it. I would say in the past, maybe, you know, it wasn't a Co of A in the past. I mean it was very	00:38:46
	clear on the recorded extension plot that that access was to be closed and reclaimed.	00:38:52
	Not at the property of LA A.	00:38:57
	But at the roadway where we maintain it.	00:39:00
	And that reported Platt calls that out so.	00:39:03
	For us today, that's what we're asking for.	00:39:06
	Commissioner Maxie is.	00:39:09
	Prior to recording a vacation plat and we would confirm that that had been done.	00:39:10
	But during the original, during the recorded exemption, there's no.	00:39:15
	We put a COA on something and we say this is a condition.	00:39:20
	Of this RE.	00:39:24
	And then we don't have any sort of time frame that.	00:39:25
	Makes us, so to speak, go back out there and inspect that this has been done. We didn't know.	00:39:29
	Could you pull up the language on that RE real quick?	00:39:36
	I want to see how it's.	00:39:39
	Yeah, but I want he wants to see what's on the recorded.	00:39:47
	Is Jimmy Chord going on?	00:39:51
	Thank you.	00:40:05
	See this parts of Ears.	00:40:37
	Maybe.	00:40:41
	Commissioner, are you asking for the language on the plat?	00:40:55
	Whatever language stipulates closing of that access.	00:40:58
	OK, so this is the this is the staff report Max Dayer department planned services. So this is the staff report for RECX 20-0063.	00:41:02
	And we have prior so approved with conditions.	00:41:10
	We have 1:00 and 2:00.	00:41:13
	One is related to OWTS and then you have prior to recording the plat. So the applicant shall satisfy the concerns of the school	00:41:15
	district and then advocate shall address the concerns with.	00:41:19
	At the time public works.	00:41:25
	And then if you go to.	00:41:27
	The referral.	00:41:30
	The referral from.	00:41:33
	Public works.	00:41:35
	At the time.	00:41:36
	Back in 2020.	00:41:37
	It identifies the.	00:41:39
	Access situation. So you have access for proposed lot off of 88 which is up here.	00:41:42
	And then you have access to proposed light A as an existing not permitted access point off of 29.	00:41:48
	514 feet South of this intersection.	00:41:54
	And then does not meet the space requirement, the residential access point.	00:41:58
	It doesn't mean it. And then it should be closed and reclaimed.	00:42:04
	For this section.	00:42:07
	In terms of the condition that we want to add, it's very redundant for the sake of this. It mirrors essentially what was was asked	00:42:09
	back in 2020.	00:42:13
	And then this was again.	00:42:18
	This condition is reflected.	00:42:20
	In this staff report as staff and shall address concerns.	00:42:24
	Was there a map recorded with this?	00:42:30
	Yes. Does it stipulate that on the map?	00:42:32
	Yeah, I can jump in. Dan Campbell, Development Review and Planning Services.	00:42:35
	Yeah. So the recorded exemption plan does have a label.	00:42:39
	Saying that the X point.	00:42:44
	Is to be closed and reclaimed.	00:42:46
	And it was recorded with that label.	00:42:49
	Access point.	00:42:53
	To be closed and reclaimed per county. What request?	00:42:55
	And this axis is not is not permitted.	00:43:02
	Right, and it's and it's access point is also part of the.	00:43:07
	County Road 29 access control plan.	00:43:11
	And it is marked as.	00:43:15
	Having a safety concern?	00:43:17
	On that plan as well.	00:43:19
	And this map was recorded when.	00:43:22
	September of 2020.	00:43:25
	And that was prior to Mr. Pettit purchasing the property, correct?	00:43:27
	So it would have come up in any sort of land purchase title research.	00:43:32
	That's correct.	00:43:38
	So it hasn't been closed.	00:43:41
	Mr. Pettit has been using it thinking that it was an access to that pond which is right there.	00:43:44
	We're wanting to.	00:43:50
	Reiterate the closure on this.	00:43:52
	Partial vacation that's in front of us right now.	00:43:55
	What assurance will we have that if we approve that, that it will actually be closed?	00:43:58
	Commissioner, I hate to approve something for the second time. If it was approved once and it's supposed to be closed and it	00:44:05
	hasn't been closed, I mean, who's to say it's?	00:44:10
	I appreciate that. Like I said, I think staff sitting up here involved in the case is committed to saying prior to recording the	00:44:14
	vacation flat.	00:44:18
	Which we would do an inspection and make sure that that's done before we allow that to move forward.	00:44:23
	And has this been something that's been talked about with Mr. Pettit throughout the process of this partial vacation that is under	00:44:27
	his name?	00:44:30
	I would say.	00:44:34
	No, like I said, I think when the staff stuff came in.	00:44:36
	The vacation plot that he submitted did not include that access, so.	00:44:41
	Again, staff.	00:44:45
	Probably wrongly without going out there before.	00:44:47
	Assumed that that had been done based on the recorded exemption plan.	00:44:50
	Madam Chair, thank you for letting me just kind of dialogue my, I think my last comment for right now is more directed towards Mr.	00:44:56
	Pettit. Mr. Pettit, it's.	00:45:00
	It's tough for me to.	00:45:05
	Go against Staffs recommendation when we have something that very clearly back in 2020 was requested.	00:45:07
	By the person who was filing that plant that's on the screen right now.	00:45:14
	Throughout the entire process, was requested to be closed, and it's on a map that is.	00:45:18
	That is publicly viewable. That is a part of a chain of title when somebody purchases or sells a property.	00:45:23
	And I guess, you know, when I, when I purchase a property, it's it's on me to make sure that I understand the stipulations of that	00:45:30
	property.	00:45:34
	And I'm just telling you this because I just, I want you to understand where I'm sitting at right now.	00:45:38
	If that wouldn't have been on the map.	00:45:42
	You know, then I would have had a little, a little harder time.	00:45:45
	With this because it's not as publicly viewable, but.	00:45:49
	When it's on a recorded map, that is something that is a part of a property that you purchased.	00:45:52
	Which I don't know when you purchased it, but it was after 2020. That's that's where I'm struggling a little bit with not saying	00:45:57
	that it needs to be closed per staff's recommendation. I just want to be upfront with you on that when it's.	00:46:03
	To be reclaimed.	00:46:09
	Who is it actually to be reclaimed to?	00:46:11
	Because.	00:46:14
	I'm now the property owner of that.	00:46:16
	Area where the access is.	00:46:19
	What? Where is it to be reclaimed? Is it actually reclaimed by the county or reclaimed by me?	00:46:24
	Because the access was given.	00:46:31
	To that house that was there.	00:46:33
	That was the whole.	00:46:36
	Access and also it was an access point for a ditch that used to run down on there.	00:46:37
	To an adjoining property so.	00:46:44
	It not only effects.	00:46:46
	Me, but there was a ditch. It's now an underground line for a water line.	00:46:48
	Feeding another farm.	00:46:54
	But that was an access for that also.	00:46:56
	So this whole.	00:47:01
	It doesn't just affect me, it affects the next property owner to the east and.	00:47:03
	Yeah. And I definitely can appreciate that, Sir. I guess my question is, is, is if that that's the case, why did the prior owner	00:47:07
	of this, who did this record exemption not have the same concerns because they went through the same process with our staff and	00:47:12
	and they.	00:47:17
	Agreed to it because they signed this plan. So why did they not have the same concerns? Probably because.	00:47:22
	In my world something like this should be a non issue.	00:47:30
	But as I guess, as the county grows and.	00:47:34
	We have different ideas about things.	00:47:38
	It becomes an issue so.	00:47:40
	Well, I appreciate the dialogue and and overall.	00:47:43
	What I'm hearing it comes down to safety.	00:47:50
	And 29 is an active Rd.	00:47:53
	So.	00:47:57
	I think we need to.	00:48:00
	Support the planning department.	00:48:03
	What are my options on getting to my pond?	00:48:07
	And I don't know if you.	00:48:13
	Talk to the.	00:48:15
	Staff after this but.	00:48:17
	And again, that was just my comments. Commissioner Pepper, do you have any comments?	00:48:20
	I was wondering if we should look at continuing this and discussion with planning as far as making sure he does have his proper	00:48:25
	access.	00:48:29
	Well, I think Commissioners, I mean, I heard that there is another access further down, but I also heard Mr. Pettit's concerns	00:48:34
	that that access.	00:48:38
	May not.	00:48:42
	Be in the best spot due to a marshy I think is the word you use Sir. A marshy area that he would have to traverse.	00:48:44
	To get back up to that pond.	00:48:52
	I mean, in the agricultural world, a recharge pond or a pond like this to serve this pivot that which I'm sure is what it's for,	00:48:56
	you have to, he has to have access to it.	00:49:01
	I think from from my standpoint there is access to the property, it's just is it in the right spot to get him access to his pond?	00:49:05
	Can I interject? I'll just ask a question of Don.	00:49:14
	The You know, it seems that Mister Pettit is concerned about his.	00:49:19
	Access for his property which is agricultural.	00:49:25
	In nature.	00:49:31
	It's he's perfectly fine with.	00:49:32
	Closing off the residential access to the other lot.	00:49:36
	But that so the access.	00:49:41
	Would be virtually his.	00:49:44
	To get to the property.	00:49:47
	For him to be able to access the pond that's there.	00:49:49
	Is that correct? Yeah, it is.	00:49:55
	Cut off to the property.	00:49:59
	It is cut off to the house right now, so the I would say.	00:50:01
	And commissioners.	00:50:06
	He does have a lot of frontage along 29. Again, 29 does have an access control plan that we need to meet.	00:50:08
	But also.	00:50:16
	29 is an arterial roadway, so we've got specific code criteria with spacing from intersections and that's just not being neat so.	00:50:18
	Access staff would be willing if there's another area that meets World County code or a different location on his frontage.	00:50:27
	That meets the code for safety criteria. We'd be willing to look at that, but.	00:50:35
	But the one in question today does not meet the ACP nor.	00:50:40
	The safety criteria at the time.	00:50:44
	It appears there's a residential access on the West side of 29. What if Mr. Pettit access was moved about 190 feet South and was	00:50:46
	straight across from that other access?	00:50:51
	It was still.	00:50:56
	Access directly into the corner, not into the pivot.	00:50:57
	Maybe that would be a benefit to access still directly into that corner for Mr. Pettit that it would also.	00:51:02
	Moving further South, that's that's an idea.	00:51:07
	I think I'll turn it in that that is an idea and it does meet the 660 foot spacing from the intersection. So again, we're we're	00:51:10
	willing to work on him if there is a better.	00:51:16
	So as a the chair, I I don't want to make a rash decision. I think this needs.	00:51:21
	More diving in.	00:51:26
	If you don't mind, I would request that someone makes a motion to continue it.	00:51:28
	And if we can get a date from the.	00:51:33
	So.	00:51:35
	I would much rather.	00:51:41
	Get this moved along on the vacation lot designations.	00:51:44
	There's.	00:51:51
	This is the first step in trying to get a farm Family Division for my daughter.	00:51:54
	Is what all this is.	00:51:59
	And it's just a first step to do a farm Family Division.	00:52:01
	All right, so I don't want to delay them.	00:52:06
	So why don't you do what you need to do?	00:52:11
	So this doesn't get delayed on their end.	00:52:15
	I will talk with the Planning Commission, hopefully they are.	00:52:19
	Workable on this situation.	00:52:22
	So is this something that we can put back on the calendar on Wednesday?	00:52:27
	I don't think on Wednesday, but my question to Mr. Pettit's point, is this something Max or or Don or whomever that that this move	00:52:31
	of the access potentially can be part of the family farm division?	00:52:36
	So today as it is right now, and then the.	00:52:44
	We could maybe talk about the recess move.	00:52:47
	So again, it's going to depend on what his request is and where the access point is for the residential. So what I hear him say	00:52:50
	he's going to do a family farm division.	00:52:54
	Which will essentially be a request eventually somewhere on the property.	00:52:59
	For residential access points. So we'll certainly evaluate that at that time.	00:53:04
	Right, right. I'm just wondering if it could be a part of that request so that we're not coming back again and then again, you	00:53:10
	know what I mean? Yeah, good point.	00:53:14
	Yes, I don't want to delay them, so I'm willing to.	00:53:19
	To work with the Planning Commission on this.	00:53:24
	If they're willing to work all right, does the planning staff have a time frame on or Mr. Pettit or?	00:53:28
	Where we're going and how quickly and.	00:53:36
	What he's suggesting is that you go ahead and approve it today and then he'll be able to move forward with his.	00:53:38
	Application for the family farm division.	00:53:45
	And work it out with respect to any other AG access.	00:53:48
	That he may need on the property. OK. And Commissioners, we will continue to work with them. So if you approve this today with	00:53:53
	this one being closed during claim, Jason, you just put an option on the table, we will certainly still look at that.	00:53:59
	We can still issue an access permit that meets of county code if it's not in that other location. The code allows us to do that,	00:54:05
	so we will certainly work with him on it.	00:54:10
	I appreciate, Commissioner Max, you're coming up with an alternative.	00:54:15
	I guess with, with what's been said then Mr. Pettit, it sounds like you're all right with us going ahead and approving this	00:54:19
	partial vacation today to allow you to move forward with the other part. And and you're well aware of what we've been talking	00:54:23
	about and I truly appreciate the dialogue and you telling us some of the concerns and.	00:54:27
	I guess, as one, Commissioner, I just would ask that you continue to work with staff on this access point move, because	00:54:32
	technically today if we.	00:54:36
	If we approve this.	00:54:39
	Then that access point is not.	00:54:41
	Not allowed where it's at. So I appreciate that. And Madam Chair, with all the dialogue and discussion, I would go ahead and move	00:54:43
	that we approve the partial vacation VC24-0028.	00:54:49
	Record exemption RAC X20-0063 for removal of Lot B Justice and Deborah Pettit.	00:54:55
	Back it up. It has been. That's where the condition.	00:55:01
	Of closing, that was what was being suggested. I apologize. I thought that was in the recommendation already. It's not okay then	00:55:06
	yes, with the condition.	00:55:11
	Of the access.	00:55:17
	And I'll second that.	00:55:19
	All right. It has been moved by Commissioner Maxie, second by Commissioner Pepler for the discussion.	00:55:21
	All in favor say aye aye. Opposed say nay.	00:55:27
	That resolution is approved. And yes, Mr. Credit, I appreciate you being here.	00:55:29
	We hope to have an alternative for you, Sir.	00:55:34
	OK. Thank you.	00:55:38
	It comes now for public comment. Each individual speaker is allowed a 3 minute period in time which to direct comments to the	00:55:40
	Board. The Chair shall enforce the rules of order and decorum and will not accept comments regarding matters which are scheduled	00:55:45
	to be considered at future public hearing, such as land use hearing.	00:55:51
	In that event, the speaker will be asked to give their testimony at the appropriate public hearing, either in person or in	00:55:57
	writing.	00:56:00
	Pursuant to the rules set forth in Section 2-1-20 dot E of the Well County Code.	00:56:04
	See no one in the audience. This meeting is adjourned. Thank you.	00:56:10